Tuesday, September 13, 2011

The World's Most Beloved Sport - The History of Soccer

By Rebecca Blain



While it is undisputed that the origins of modern soccer, or football, originated in Britain, there is a great deal of evidence that points to this beloved game as having an older history.

Where did the game of soccer really begin, and how old is it? To understand how many different varieties of "soccer" there are, you need to understand a bit about the older versions of the game and how they have evolved.

Below, you will find a list of the predominant cultures that had a variety of soccer, and learn how each one differs from what we play today. And no, they never used anything like Lotto shinguards back then either!

  • Chinese Soccer History
  • Japanese Soccer History
  • Egyptian Soccer History
  • Greek/Roman Soccer History
  • British Soccer History

Chinese Soccer History

To many, this is the oldest version of soccer to exist. However, there is quite a lot of controversy of whether or not this is the oldest, or Japan's version is the elder. The Chinese version of the game, originally named "Tsu Chu", involved players on a field that had to hit a leather ball stuffed with fur into a small hole. Like Soccer, no hands were permitted during the play of the game, and it was considered an honor to be a member of a team.

The Emperor of the Han Dynasty, when the game was developed, was an avid player and fan, and spread the popularity of this game all over China during his reign. This roughly dates back to 300 B.C., although there is controversy on the subject of dating, which could result in the origins of the game being as far back as 5000 B.C. Regardless, this version of Soccer is extremely old. Despite that, there is still a version of Tsu Chu played today. While the two games are similar, Tsu Chu has had no effect on the modern version of the game, as it was originally developed and created for play in Great Britain.

Japanese Soccer History

Kemari, the Japanese version of "Soccer", is perhaps one of the most different forms of the sport, in comparison to modern soccer. Kemari was a game of "Keep it up", much like modern hacky sacks, although used with a larger ball that was stuffed with saw dust. This version involves a "pitch", or the field, designated by the selection of four trees, the cherry, maple, pine and willow. Many great houses in Japan would grow trees to have a permanent pitch, or field, established.

Kemari was normally played with two to twelve players. Established in roughly 1004 B.C., it vies for position of the oldest game with China's Tsu Chu. In fact, China's Tsu Chu players and Japan's Kemari players were the first to have an "International" game of their versions of Soccer, which is dated to have occurred in roughly 50 B.C., although a definite date of 611 A.D. is known. Regardless, this game stands with China as a sister sport to Soccer, while it never affected the modern version of the game.

Egyptian Soccer History

While not much is known about Egyptian Soccer, or other ball games, it is thought there was a version of a type of ball game played by young women during the age of Baqet III. On his tomb, images of this sport were depicted, although no one is certain how the game was played or whether or not it truly affected the outcome of modern soccer. Recordings of this game date as far back as 2500 B.C., although not much more is known asides the fact that it was played with a ball. The lack of information on the sport and how it was played has eliminated it from runnings as the first evidence of a game similar to soccer.

Greek/Roman Soccer History

Perhaps the closest relative to modern soccer are the games that were formed by the Greeks during the prime of their culture. They had numerous varieties of football style games, some of which required hands, some of which forbade hands. In the end, after the Roman conquering of Greece, the game Harpastum is what modern soccer would be based from. This game, probably a modified version of the Greek's "Harpaston", which translates roughly to handball. While grossly misnamed, this game is what is considered to be one of the precursors to modern soccer.

British Soccer History

In Britain during the 8th century, soccer was created, not as a recreational sport, but as a war game. One of the stories of the original roots of the sport comes from when a Danish Prince was beheaded, and his head was used as a ball and was kicked around. Ever since this 'legendary' tale, villages and other communities would play a game where they would have to kick a ball to a specific goal. It was a violent game, where injury and death were not uncommon, but it was popular nevertheless. In fact, it was so violent, that in 1331, King Edward the III passed laws to try to stop the playing of the game. It did not work, however, and the sport continued on.

There are even stories of soccer games that involved hundreds upon hundreds of players. In these games, there were many deaths, some resulting in the hundreds. It wasn't until 1815 when Eton College set up a series of rules for the game that it became less violent and more of a true sport. At this time, other colleges and universities took up the banner and began to play under similar rules. Later, the rules were evaluated and judged, and the Cambridge rules were created as a result in 1848. In the Cambridge rules, shin-kicking, carrying the ball and tripping were all forbidden. Rugby rules allowed these aspects, and the two varieties of soccer, or football, split to form their own followings.

On October 26, 1863, London schools and sports club sent representatives to the Freemason's Tavern, where the Football Association was formed. Rugby supporters left this association to form the Rugby Association. This is where the birth of modern soccer began. In 1969, the Football Association finalized the modern game of soccer by forbidding the use of hands in the game.

The term "Soccer" was coined when someone was asked if he was a Rugger, which is a Rugby player. The -er signified that the person participated in a a particular sport. The individual, Charles Wreford Brown, replied with "Soccer!", taking the phrase from Association, SOC, and adding the -er. The term stuck. While British individuals still call the game Football, Americans and other countries call it Soccer, especially if they have heavy support in American Football present. Ever since the foundation of the Association, "Football" has risen in popularity, becoming one of the best love games in the history of Earth. Now, hundreds of thousands play the sport, although it lacks the initial violence present at its creation.

About The Author

Rebecca Blain is a professional and hobbyist writer who enjoys taking care of her fish and educating people about soccer equipment such as goals which you can read about here:

http://www.everything-soccer.com/8-24-soccer-goals.html


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Rebecca_Blain



Grab The Bookmarketer For Your Site

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Is Italian football going backwards?


The Italian League has some of the best footballers in it but why is it their top players want to leave and go to a rival leagues? There may be many reasons; one could be that it has been stagnant for many years. You could say it is also down to the match fixing which saw the most successful club Juventus stripped of two of their league titles and caused them to get demoted to the Serie B. Also there have been other problems such as low crowds, racism, hooliganism, and various other problems that have plagued their game, despite Inter Milan did win the European Champions League which they weren't favourites to win.

Don't let the Champions League win deceive you as only one of the players were Italian and to make things worse he was a substitute that play in the final minute of stoppage time. If you were to compare it with their German opponents they had five Germans in the starting line up and then had two more Germans who came off the bench with the second one coming on around the 75th minute. So in theory it wasn't really an Italian team which is why the Italian public have played it down a bit.

If we were to look at the national side of things things don't look good as the team, they have been heavily criticised and after the world cup, the criticism has gotten more vocal. They have been criticised for their ageing squad. Most of the players that were picked were veterans who were part of 2006 championship winning team.

When there were calls to inject young players these calls were ignored for example Antonio Cassano who just had a great season at Sampdoria has been absent from the national team for two years. Being snubbed from the Italian squad before the world cup led to widespread criticism of Marcello Lippi from not only fans but the media alike. Although he has been remitted into the Italian team by head coach Cesare Prandelli.

The 2010 World Cup campaign was a complete embarrassment for them - they couldn't make it out of the first round; it was a fall from grace, from champions four years ago to in 2010 being held to a draw by country that is 50 ranks blow them in the FIFA rankings. Undeniably they had an group compared to what their rivals had - it was shameful for the country. The final game was the straw that broke the camel's back; you could visually see the players themselves where ashamed of how little they accomplished in this tournament and that they want to go back home to their villas in Italy as soon as possible.

You could say since the 2006 victory was the beginning of the downward spiral that has seen them perform worse at each competition - knocked out of Euro 2008 after passing the group stage came and third in their group in the Confederation Cup. In that time Italy has searching for new managers every few years.

Italian Football in general is at an all time low compared to the glory days of the 80s and certainly the 90s. What can be done to improve the state of league play and can the national squad get out of its rut? Flagging national teams' problems generally dissipate only young talent us slowly introduced into the team. Has Italy strung out one group of players for too long?

The Italian League has some of the best footballers in it but why is it their top players want to leave and go to a rival leagues? There may be many reasons; one could be that it has been stagnant for many years. You could say it is also down to the match fixing which saw the most successful club Juventus stripped of two of their league titles and caused them to get demoted to the Serie B. Also there have been other problems such as low crowds, racism, hooliganism, and various other problems that have plagued their game, despite Inter Milan did win the European Champions League which they weren't favourites to win.

Don't let the Champions League win deceive you as only one of the players were Italian and to make things worse he was a substitute that play in the final minute of stoppage time. If you were to compare it with their German opponents they had five Germans in the starting line up and then had two more Germans who came off the bench with the second one coming on around the 75th minute. So in theory it wasn't really an Italian team which is why the Italian public have played it down a bit.

If we were to look at the national side of things things don't look good as the team, they have been heavily criticised and after the world cup, the criticism has gotten more vocal. They have been criticised for their ageing squad. Most of the players that were picked were veterans who were part of 2006 championship winning team.

When there were calls to inject young players these calls were ignored for example Antonio Cassano who just had a great season at Sampdoria has been absent from the national team for two years. Being snubbed from the Italian squad before the world cup led to widespread criticism of Marcello Lippi from not only fans but the media alike. Although he has been remitted into the Italian team by head coach Cesare Prandelli.

The 2010 World Cup campaign was a complete embarrassment for them - they couldn't make it out of the first round; it was a fall from grace, from champions four years ago to in 2010 being held to a draw by country that is 50 ranks blow them in the FIFA rankings. Undeniably they had an group compared to what their rivals had - it was shameful for the country. The final game was the straw that broke the camel's back; you could visually see the players themselves where ashamed of how little they accomplished in this tournament and that they want to go back home to their villas in Italy as soon as possible.

You could say since the 2006 victory was the beginning of the downward spiral that has seen them perform worse at each competition - knocked out of Euro 2008 after passing the group stage came and third in their group in the Confederation Cup. In that time Italy has searching for new managers every few years.

Italian Football in general is at an all time low compared to the glory days of the 80s and certainly the 90s. What can be done to improve the state of league play and can the national squad get out of its rut? Flagging national teams' problems generally dissipate only young talent us slowly introduced into the team. Has Italy strung out one group of players for too long?



Grab The Bookmarketer For Your Site